Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Vito GALLELLO, Petitioner, v. H. Carl McCALL, as State Comptroller, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's request for accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner, a sanitation worker for the Village of Scarsdale in Westchester County, injured his back when he inexplicably slipped and fell while dumping a barrel of garbage. Respondent denied his application for accidental disability retirement benefits, prompting the commencement of this proceeding. Because petitioner was unable to establish that his slip and fall was caused by anything other than an ordinary misstep, respondent's conclusion that there had been no “accident” within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 63 was rational (see, Matter of Hetzler v. New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 232 A.D.2d 946, 648 N.Y.S.2d 813; Matter of Watson v. McCall, 232 A.D.2d 862, 649 N.Y.S.2d 486). Furthermore, substantial evidence supports respondent's ruling that petitioner failed to prove that he was permanently incapacitated from performing his duties. The orthopedist who examined petitioner on behalf of the State and Local Employees' Retirement System testified that there was no objective medical proof that petitioner was unable to perform his assigned duties (see, Matter of Klug v. McCall, 224 A.D.2d 818, 638 N.Y.S.2d 191). Although contrary medical evidence also was presented, respondent was free to resolve the conflict as he did by accepting one medical expert's opinion over that of the others (see, Matter of Nickels v. McCall, 242 A.D.2d 826, 661 N.Y.S.2d 1020).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 05, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)