Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Donald FAISON, Appellant, v. Daniel A. SENKOWSKI, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered March 25, 1997 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondents, finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit refusing to obey a direct order, interference and verbal harassment. Included in the evidence presented at petitioner's disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report relating that petitioner had become irate when a correction officer informed him that he would not be permitted to spend the entire day at the facility's law library. Petitioner told the officer to “shut up” and refused to obey an order to proceed to his office. Two additional officers were then necessary to subdue petitioner. The testimony of the reporting correction officer was consistent with this account as was petitioner's own testimony in which he admitted to perpetrating the charged misconduct. Such proof was sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 05, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)