Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, Petitioner, v. Thomas A. MAUL, etc., et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the State of New York Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated August 27, 1996, which, after a hearing, rejected the petitioner's objection to the establishment of a community residential facility for the disabled in the Town of Oyster Bay.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The petitioner contends that the determination in question should be annulled based on its claim that the proposed community residential facility would substantially alter the nature and character of the surrounding area, inter alia, by increasing foot and vehicle traffic. These concerns were properly rejected by the Commissioner since they are speculative and undocumented (see, Matter of Jennings v. State Off. of Mental Health, 90 N.Y.2d 227, 660 N.Y.S.2d 352, 682 N.E.2d 953; Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v. Maul, 231 A.D.2d 580, 647 N.Y.S.2d 240; Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v. Maul, 231 A.D.2d 579, 647 N.Y.S.2d 242). The petitioner presented no concrete evidence that the establishment of the facility would alter the nature and character of the area.
As the determination was based upon the findings that there was a need for the facility and that there was not an overconcentration of similar facilities in the area, the determination was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary and capricious.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)