Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BARBARA ANNE, INC., d/b/a Brunchies, respondent, v. SMITHHAVEN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., appellants.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), entered May 17, 1999, which granted the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on the first cause of action and denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered November 1, 1999, as, upon renewal, granted the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on the first cause of action to the limited extent of directing a hearing on the issue of whether the defendants unreasonably refused to consent to the site location for the plaintiff's kiosk.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order entered May 17, 1999, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered November 1, 1999; and it is further,
ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the defendants' notice of appeal from the order entered November 1, 1999, is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701[c] ); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order entered November 1, 1999, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the order entered May 17, 1999, is vacated, the motion is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.
The terms of the lease and the circumstances surrounding its signing establish that the parties intended a specific location inside the Smith Haven Mall. The plaintiff's failure to obtain a building permit for that particular location excused the defendants' performance under the lease (see, 67 Wall St. Co. v. Franklin Nat. Bank, 37 N.Y.2d 245, 371 N.Y.S.2d 915, 333 N.E.2d 184).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 19, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)