Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the HEMPSTEAD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent, v. HEMPSTEAD CLASSROOM TEACHERS, ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, Hempstead Classroom Teachers Association and William Gray appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated March 31, 1997, which granted the petition, denied the cross application to confirm the award, and directed a rehearing before the arbitrator.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the cross application to confirm is granted.
The arbitrator's conclusion that the termination of William Gray as a probationary teacher violated the subject collective bargaining agreement was entirely rational and did not constitute a rewriting of that agreement (see, Matter of Town of Callicoon [Civil Serv. Assn.], 70 N.Y.2d 907, 524 N.Y.S.2d 389, 519 N.E.2d 300; Matter of Local Div. 1179 [Green Bus Lines], 50 N.Y.2d 1007, 431 N.Y.S.2d 680, 409 N.E.2d 1354; Matter of West Babylon Union Free School Dist. v. West Babylon Teachers' Assn., 237 A.D.2d 615, 657 N.Y.S.2d 902; Matter of Dutchess Bldg. Renovations v. Immerblum, 198 A.D.2d 413, 604 N.Y.S.2d 125; Matter of East Ramapo Teachers Assn. v. East Ramapo Cent. School Dist., 191 A.D.2d 696, 595 N.Y.S.2d 529). Moreover, the unsubstantiated assertion of the Board of Education of the Hempstead Union Free School District (hereinafter the Board) that the arbitrator erred as to the date upon which Gray's fourth year of probationary employment commenced provides no basis for vacatur, since it is axiomatic that “an arbitrator's award will not be vacated for errors of law and fact committed by the arbitrator” (Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 N.Y.2d 623, 629, 415 N.Y.S.2d 974, 389 N.E.2d 456).
The board's contention that the award is violative of public policy is improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see, Matter of County of Suffolk v. Faculty Assn. of Suffolk County Community Coll., 247 A.D.2d 472, 668 N.Y.S.2d 98 ) and, in any event, is without merit (see generally, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], supra; Matter of Cohoes City School Dist. v. Cohoes Teachers Assn., 40 N.Y.2d 774, 390 N.Y.S.2d 53, 358 N.E.2d 878; Board of Educ., Bellmore-Merrick Cent. High School Dist., Nassau County v. Bellmore-Merrick United Secondary Teachers, 39 N.Y.2d 167, 383 N.Y.S.2d 242, 347 N.E.2d 603).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 15, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)