Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Jean DELLAUNIVERSITA, Appellant, v. TEK PRECISION COMPANY LTD., Respondent. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed June 3, 1997, which ruled that claimant's claim for workers' compensation death benefits abated upon her death.
In 1987, claimant's husband (hereinafter decedent) suffered a work-related cerebral vascular accident. When decedent later died of cardiopulmonary arrest, claimant, as his widow, filed a claim for workers' compensation death benefits. Hearings ensued on the contested issue of whether decedent's death was causally related to the 1987 incident. Claimant died, leaving no dependents of her own, before causal relationship was established and the Workers' Compensation Board ruled that her claim for workers' compensation death benefits abated upon her death. We are constrained to agree. While a claim for workers' compensation death benefits will not abate upon a claimant's death where there has been a determination on the merits in the claimant's favor (see, Matter of Stattel v. Ebert, 59 A.D.2d 60, 62, 397 N.Y.S.2d 230; Matter of Brown v. Central Coal Co., 3 A.D.2d 867, 161 N.Y.S.2d 712), here, causal relationship, an integral part of the claim, had yet to be determined at the time of claimant's death. The fact that all other issues relevant to the claim had been previously decided in claimant's favor does not mandate a contrary result (see, Matter of Harris v. Celbert Garage Corp., 29 A.D.2d 606, 607, 285 N.Y.S.2d 665).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 18, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)