Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Patrick MATHIEU, Petitioner, v. Michael T. GIAMBRUNO, as Superintendent of Wyoming Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Wyoming Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit committing an unhygienic act and destroying state property. The misbehavior report relates that a urine stain was found on the underside of petitioner's mattress during a search of his cell. The misbehavior report, testimony at the hearing that the mattress had recently been replaced and that there had been no damage to the cell upon petitioner's placement in the cell, together with the inferences to be drawn therefrom, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Webb v. Goord, 254 A.D.2d 551, 679 N.Y.S.2d 719 [1998], appeal dismissed 93 N.Y.2d 849, 688 N.Y.S.2d 496, 710 N.E.2d 1095 [1999]; Matter of Navarro v. Selsky, 249 A.D.2d 654, 671 N.Y.S.2d 183 [1998] ). Petitioner's denial of the charges and challenge to the damage form he signed upon being released from the cell presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Williams v. Ricks, 303 A.D.2d 860, 861, 755 N.Y.S.2d 343 [2003]; Matter of Navarro v. Selsky, supra; Matter of Covington v. Stinson, 221 A.D.2d 739, 633 N.Y.S.2d 646 [1995], lv. denied 87 N.Y.2d 810, 642 N.Y.S.2d 859, 665 N.E.2d 661 [1996] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 08, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)