Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dominick ROBINSON, etc., et al., appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated July 22, 2005, which granted the defendants' motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
The infant plaintiff, a student at IS 285 in Brooklyn, allegedly was assaulted and injured by two other students on school grounds, at about 3:30 P.M. on February 10, 2003.
The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572), and the Supreme Court should have denied their motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In support of their motion, the defendants submitted, and relied upon, a copy of the transcript of the plaintiff mother's examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h. However, a page of that transcript was missing. According to the plaintiffs, the missing page captured the mother's testimony that there was a school dismissal security plan in place at the subject school which was not followed at the time the infant plaintiff was assaulted.
The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.
We reject the plaintiffs' request that we search the record and award them summary judgment on the issue of liability (see CPLR 3212[b] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 06, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)