Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JONES SLEDZIK GARNEAU & NARDONE, LLP, respondent, v. Galit SCHLOSS, appellant.
In an action to recover legal fees, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered November 15, 2004, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, dismissed the defendant's affirmative defenses, and denied her cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered November 17, 2004, which, upon the order, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the sum of $97,119.17.
ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The order granting summary judgment was dated and entered on November 15, 2004. The judgment, which was also dated November 15, 2004, was entered two days later on November 17, 2004. The plaintiff served the order with notice of entry of the order by overnight mail on November 16, 2004, and served the judgment with notice of entry on November 20, 2004. The defendant filed a notice of appeal on December 21, 2004, specifying the paper being appealed as the “Short Form Order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 5, [sic] 2004.” Six months later, the defendant filed a notice of appeal from the November 15, 2004, judgment.
An appeal must be taken “within thirty days after service by a party upon the appellant of a copy of the judgment or order appealed from and written notice of its entry” (CPLR 5513[a] ). The time period for filing a notice of appeal is nonwaivable and jurisdictional (see Matter of Haverstraw Park v. Runcible Props., 33 N.Y.2d 637, 347 N.Y.S.2d 585, 301 N.E.2d 553; Matter of Ogborn v. Hilts, 262 A.D.2d 857, 692 N.Y.S.2d 490). Both notices of appeal were untimely under CPLR 5513(a).
Accordingly, the defendant failed to comply with the jurisdictional requirement of CPLR 5513 and the appeals must be dismissed (see People ex rel. McReynolds v. Commissioner, Off. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities, 19 A.D.3d 438, 795 N.Y.S.2d 900; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v. Soto, 254 A.D.2d 483, 679 N.Y.S.2d 621; Deygoo v. Eastern Abstract Corp., 204 A.D.2d 596, 612 N.Y.S.2d 415).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 06, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)