Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. CAM QUAN, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Sherman, J.), rendered July 7, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the first degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the first degree in satisfaction of a 20-count indictment charging him with various crimes stemming from his participation in an incident where he and two cohorts entered a restaurant with a firearm, held the employees captive by tying them up and robbed them. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant to a prison term of 7 1/212 years. Defendant now appeals on the grounds that his waiver of his right to appeal was not voluntary and his sentence was harsh and excessive. We do not agree.
The record reveals that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal. Thus, the issue concerning whether his sentence was harsh and excessive has not been preserved for our review (see People v. Smith, 21 A.D.3d 1186, 1187, 800 N.Y.S.2d 861 [2005]; People v. King, 20 A.D.3d 580, 581, 798 N.Y.S.2d 213 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 829, 804 N.Y.S.2d 44, 837 N.E.2d 743 [2005]; People v. Allen, 301 A.D.2d 874, 875-876, 754 N.Y.S.2d 105 [2003], lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 652, 760 N.Y.S.2d 116, 790 N.E.2d 290 [2003] ). In any event, even if we were to address defendant's claim, we would find it to be unavailing. To that end, we note that defendant received the benefit of a negotiated plea agreement which significantly reduced the potential exposure that he otherwise faced (see People v. Hicks, 245 A.D.2d 979, 979, 667 N.Y.S.2d 130 [1997]; People v. Diaz, 240 A.D.2d 961, 962, 660 N.Y.S.2d 72 [1997] ). Indeed, the sentence imposed by County Court was actually shorter than that which had been recommended by the People and agreed to by defendant at the time that the plea was entered. Moreover, we do not discern any basis in the record for the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
CARPINELLO, J.
CARDONA, P.J., SPAIN, MUGGLIN and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 16, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)