Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, etc., et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, James L. Stone, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health, dated October 24, 1995, which, after a hearing, granted the application of Aid to the Developmentally Disabled, Inc., to establish a community residential facility for the mentally disabled in the Town of Southampton.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with one bill of costs, payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
A party contesting the establishment of a community residential facility must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the residence would create an overconcentration of similar facilities such that the nature and character of the area would be substantially altered. The petitioner's proof, consisting mainly of conclusory assertions to the effect that the Town was becoming a “dumping ground” and that it was saturated with these types of residences, was insufficient to meet its burden. Further, we find that the determination of the New York State Office of Mental Health was supported by substantial evidence (see, Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34[c][5]; Matter of Town of Brookhaven v. New York State Off. of Mental Health, 214 A.D.2d 617, 625 N.Y.S.2d 575; Matter of Town of Mount Pleasant v. New York State Off. of Mental Health, 200 A.D.2d 576, 606 N.Y.S.2d 296; Matter of Town of Hempstead v. Commissioner, State of N.Y. Off. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 160 A.D.2d 1011, 554 N.Y.S.2d 1017).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 31, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)