Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Nelson GOMEZ, Appellant, v. Melvin L. HOLLIS, as Superintendent of Oneida Correctional Facility, Department of Correctional Services, State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia Jr., J.), entered February 22, 2000 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition for lack of standing.
Petitioner pleaded guilty to violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit possessing contraband, smuggling and drug possession in connection with a March 14, 1999 visit with his wife. In addition to other penalties, petitioner's right to visitation was revoked for 11 years. Thereafter, petitioner's wife was notified that her visitation privileges with petitioner had been revoked as a result of the drug-smuggling incident and petitioner's guilty plea to the charges stemming therefrom. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination revoking his wife's visitation privileges. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding and this appeal ensued.
We agree with Supreme Court that petitioner confuses his disciplinary determination with the separate determination which revoked his wife's visitation privileges pursuant to 7 NYCRR part 200 (see, Matter of Inman v. Coughlin, 156 A.D.2d 786, 549 N.Y.S.2d 207). The fact that petitioner did not challenge his disciplinary determination does not give him standing to challenge the revocation of his wife's visitation nor to protest the implication that she was involved in the drug-smuggling incident. Moreover, petitioner's wife failed to avail herself of the procedure to contest the revocation of visitation privileges despite being notified of the opportunity to do so.
Finally, we reject petitioner's conclusory assertion that the termination of his wife's visitation rights violated his due process rights.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 02, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)