Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Byron FUGATE, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits the possession of a weapon after a search of his cell revealed a 6 1/212-inch metal shank in a box labeled Domeboro found hidden behind a locker. The record reveals that petitioner had been issued the Domeboro medication three months earlier. The fact that petitioner did not have exclusive control over the area where the weapon was found is insufficient to defeat the inference of impropriety (see, Matter of Mendez v. Jones, 176 A.D.2d 423, 574 N.Y.S.2d 412). Significantly, petitioner's cellmate had only been in the custody of the Department of Correctional Services for two weeks. Furthermore, petitioner testified that his friendship with a homosexual inmate had caused a rift with other inmate friends. Given this evidence and the inferences to be drawn therefrom, substantial evidence supports the finding that petitioner was in possession of the weapon (see, Matter of Tarbell v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 563, 693 N.Y.S.2d 262; Matter of Scott v. Coombe, 238 A.D.2d 648, 656 N.Y.S.2d 953). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 09, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)