Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Ascona SANTIAGO, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered April 27, 1998, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to a determinate term of 25 years imprisonment.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing by a different Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his challenge for cause of a juror who admitted having arthritis in his back. However, that juror conformed to all of the qualifications specified in Judiciary Law § 510, and no questions were raised with regard to his impartiality (see, Judiciary Law § 510, as amended by L. 1995, ch. 86). The Supreme Court stated that if the juror's back began to hurt from sitting too long, it would accommodate him by taking frequent breaks (see, People v. Guzman, 76 N.Y.2d 1, 556 N.Y.S.2d 7, 555 N.E.2d 259). Thus, the Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant's challenge for cause.
However, the case must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing. The remarks made by the Supreme Court demonstrated that it considered crimes of which the defendant was acquitted as a basis for sentencing (see, People v. Grant, 191 A.D.2d 297, 595 N.Y.S.2d 38; People v. Coward, 100 A.D.2d 628, 473 N.Y.S.2d 591).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)