Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: OIL CO., INC., Petitioners, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, etc., et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation dated July 9, 1998, which adopted the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of an Administrative Law Judge finding, after a hearing, that the petitioners violated the Navigation Law and certain water, air, and tidal wetlands regulations and imposed a penalty in the sum of $3,499,680.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Following an administrative hearing, the respondent New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter the DEC) adopted the findings of an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) and determined that the petitioners had committed over 18,000 violations of New York State's environmental and navigation laws and regulations.
The findings of the ALJ as adopted by the DEC are supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193; Matter of DiCairano v. Gandolfo, 201 A.D.2d 727, 609 N.Y.S.2d 619).
In addition, the penalty imposed is not excessive. It is well settled that the power of this court to review administrative action and the extent of the sanction imposed is strictly limited (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321). Here, the petitioners continued to operate a major oil storage facility for over 10 years without the necessary permits and licenses and reaped the benefits of its operation without complying with numerous statutes and regulations. Consequently, the penalty imposed was not “ ‘so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all of the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness' ” (Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., supra, at 233, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321).
The petitioners remaining contentions are either without merit, time-barred, or not properly before this court.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)