Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JAMES McCULLAGH CO., INC., respondent, v. SOUTH HUNTINGTON UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, appellant.
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated May 23, 2006, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with Education Law § 3813(1) and (2-b).
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with Education Law § 3813(1) and (2-b) is granted.
Pursuant to Education Law § 3813, no action may be maintained against a school district unless a notice of claim was served within three months of the date on which the claim accrued (see Education Law § 3813 [1]; C.S.A. Contr. Corp. v. New York City School Constr. Auth., 5 N.Y.3d 189, 192, 800 N.Y.S.2d 123, 833 N.E.2d 266; Parochial Bus Sys. v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 N.Y.2d 539, 547, 470 N.Y.S.2d 564, 458 N.E.2d 1241). In actions “for monies due ․ [on a] contract, accrual of such claim shall be deemed to have occurred as of the date payment for the amount claimed was denied” (Education Law § 3813[1] ). Moreover, Education Law § 3813(2-b) provides that no action against a school district shall be commenced more than one year after the cause of action arose. A breach of contract can be said to occur when the party seeking payment should have viewed his claim as having been constructively rejected (see Education Law § 3813[1]; see Matter of Hawthorne Cedar Knolls Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Carey & Walsh, 36 A.D.3d 810, 828 N.Y.S.2d 221; Dodge, Chamberlin, Luzine, Weber Architects v. Dutchess County Bd. of Coop. Educ., Servs., 258 A.D.2d 434, 435, 684 N.Y.S.2d 583; Alfred Santini & Co. v. City of New York, 266 A.D.2d 119, 120, 698 N.Y.S.2d 678).
Here, the defendant established that the plaintiff's request for payment had been constructively rejected no later than February 2004, and thus, the cause of action accrued more than three months prior to service the notice of claim in July 2004 and more than one year before commencement of the action in May 2005 (see Capstone Enters. of Port Chester, Inc. v. Valhalla Union Free School Dist., 27 A.D.3d 411, 412, 809 N.Y.S.2d 917).
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendant was not estopped from asserting its defense pursuant to Education Law § 3813 (see Bronco Bus Corp. v. City of Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 250 A.D.2d 718, 719, 672 N.Y.S.2d 920).
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 03, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)