Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Glenn WITKOWSKI, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following an investigation into an inmate's bed being set on fire, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a fire, destroying state property and making threats. That same day, while the property in petitioner's cell was being packed, 24 excess blankets and pillows were discovered. Consequently, petitioner was charged in a second misbehavior report with possessing state bedding in excess of the amount authorized. After the initial determination on the charges was reversed, a tier III rehearing was conducted. At the conclusion of the rehearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with the hearing testimony, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Fontaine v. Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, 35 A.D.3d 1113, 1113-1114, 825 N.Y.S.2d 595 [2006], appeal dismissed 8 N.Y.3d 943, 834 N.Y.S.2d 720, 866 N.E.2d 1049 [2007] ). Contrary to petitioner's claim, the Hearing Officer adequately assessed the reliability and credibility of the confidential informants through his detailed questioning of the correction officer who spoke to them (see Matter of Staton v. Goord, 41 A.D.3d 1105, 1106, 839 N.Y.S.2d 820 [2007]; Matter of Plowden v. Bunn, 38 A.D.3d 1107, 1108, 830 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2007] ). Moreover, our review of the record discloses that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and the determination did not flow from any alleged bias on the part of the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Evans v. Goord, 41 A.D.3d 1127, 1128, 840 N.Y.S.2d 173 [2007] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)