Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael MORRISSEY, respondent, v. Martha MORRISSEY, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Martha Morrissey appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Tamra Walker, J.), dated February 10, 2025. The order of fact-finding and disposition, after an inquest, and upon Martha Morrissey's default, inter alia, found that she committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
In May 2024, the petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8 for an order of protection against the appellant. In October 2024, the Family Court, with both parties present, scheduled a fact-finding hearing for February 10, 2025. On February 10, 2025, the appellant failed to appear, and the court conducted an inquest, at which the appellant's attorney declined to participate. The appellant's attorney informed the court that the appellant was on her way, and the attorney did not request an adjournment or object to the inquest. In an order of fact-finding and disposition dated February 10, 2025, the court, inter alia, found that the appellant had committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree. This appeal ensued.
No appeal lies from an order made upon the default of the appealing party (see CPLR 5511). Since the order of fact-finding and disposition was entered upon the appellant's default, review is limited to matters which were the subject of contest before the Family Court (see Matter of Kaileigh–Kouture A.M. [Jessica–Maria M.], 240 A.D.3d 694, 695, 235 N.Y.S.3d 201). Contrary to the appellant's contention, the court's failure to adjourn the fact-finding hearing was not a subject of contest before the court (see Matter of Aurora B. [Eric H.], 212 A.D.3d 806, 808, 181 N.Y.S.3d 658). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2025-02629
Decided: May 13, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)