Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: KARYN KATRINA D. (Anonymous). Association to Benefit Children/Variety House for Children, respondent; Kelty D. (Anonymous), a/k/a Cassie D. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, inter alia, on the ground of mental illness, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated June 14, 2004, as, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that she is unable to provide proper and adequate care for the subject child by reason of her mental illness, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to the Association to Benefit Children/Variety House for Children and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court properly found that there was clear and convincing evidence that she is presently and for the foreseeable future unable, by reason of mental illness, to provide proper and adequate care for the subject child (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d 39, 45-46, 489 N.Y.S.2d 705, 478 N.E.2d 1306; Matter of Julia P., 8 A.D.3d 389, 777 N.Y.S.2d 729; Matter of Erica D., 294 A.D.2d 435, 742 N.Y.S.2d 112; Matter of Pauline Y., 193 A.D.2d 686, 598 N.Y.S.2d 32). After a psychiatrist interviewed the mother and reviewed her voluminous medical records pertaining to her history of mental illness, he opined that due to the chronic nature of her illness, the severity of her symptoms, and her lack of insight about her illness, if returned to the mother, the child would be at risk of being neglected in the present and foreseeable future (see Matter of Winston Lloyd D., 7 A.D.3d 706, 707, 777 N.Y.S.2d 175; Matter of Pariis L., 286 A.D.2d 501, 729 N.Y.S.2d 631; Matter of Erica D., supra ).
The Family Court providently exercised its discretion by not conducting a separate dispositional hearing, as the petition was granted on the ground of mental illness (see Matter of Joyce T., supra at 46, 489 N.Y.S.2d 705, 478 N.E.2d 1306; Matter of Julia P., supra; Matter of Winston Lloyd D., supra at 707, 777 N.Y.S.2d 175; Matter of Nina D., 6 A.D.3d 702, 703, 775 N.Y.S.2d 377; Matter of Michelle H., 228 A.D.2d 440, 643 N.Y.S.2d 646).
The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 20, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)