Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Vera SHADE, petitioner, v. Kevin MAHON, etc., et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Kevin Mahon, as Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Social Services, dated December 29, 2005, which adopted the findings of fact and recommendation of a hearing officer dated December 11, 2005, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct and terminating her employment as an eligibility examiner.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The petitioner was charged with misconduct by her employer, the Westchester County Department of Social Services, inter alia, for submitting false information on a recertification application for public assistance. Following a hearing, the petitioner's employment as an eligibility examiner was terminated.
The review of an administrative decision made after an employee disciplinary hearing is limited to a consideration of whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 231, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321; Matter of Jones v. Mahon, 11 A.D.3d 692, 783 N.Y.S.2d 295). Here, the determination of misconduct was supported by substantial evidence including, among other things, the petitioner's testimony that her niece, whom she listed as a member of her New York household and for whom she received public assistance, was living in Virginia.
The disciplinary penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the misconduct as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see Matter of Featherstone v. Franco, 95 N.Y.2d 550, 720 N.Y.S.2d 93, 742 N.E.2d 607; cf. Matter of Goudy v. Schaffer, 24 A.D.3d 764, 808 N.Y.S.2d 712).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 13, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)