Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lucille DeSTRANGE, Respondent, v. Allan H. LIND, etc., et al., Appellants.
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered September 27, 1999, as granted the plaintiff's cross motion for a protective order limiting the disclosure of her medical records to five years before the accrual of her cause of action herein.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
By commencing this action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff waived the physician-patient privilege with respect to her relevant past medical history (see, CPLR 3121; Coddington v. Lisk, 249 A.D.2d 817, 671 N.Y.S.2d 826). That waiver must be read in conjunction with the mandate of CPLR 3101(a), which provides for disclosure of all matter “material and necessary” to the defense of the action (see, Andon v. 302-304 Mott St. Assocs., 94 N.Y.2d 740, 709 N.Y.S.2d 873, 731 N.E.2d 589). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in limiting the defendants' access to the plaintiff's past medical records to the five-year period before the alleged acts of malpractice in controversy, as the defendants failed to demonstrate that access to earlier medical records would result in the discovery of admissible or relevant evidence (see, King v. Salvation Army, 240 A.D.2d 473, 658 N.Y.S.2d 437; Manley v. New York City Hous. Auth., 190 A.D.2d 600, 593 N.Y.S.2d 808).
The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)