Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Allen KEFFER, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered August 24, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to law enforcement authorities.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court found that although the defendant's initial statement to the police at the time of his arrest was obtained in violation of statutory parental notification requirements pertaining to juvenile offenders (see, CPL 120.90[7]; 140.20[6]; 140.40[5] ), any taint arising therefrom was attenuated by the time he made his subsequent statements to the police, which were obtained in compliance with those requirements (see, People v. Harris, 77 N.Y.2d 434, 568 N.Y.S.2d 702, 570 N.E.2d 1051). Under the circumstances of this case, the hearing court's finding is supported by the record (see, People v. Bolus, 185 A.D.2d 1007, 587 N.Y.S.2d 446). Therefore, that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement authorities was properly denied.
The defendant's additional contention, that the County Court erred in denying his motion to remove the action to the Family Court under CPL 210.43, is also without merit, as there are no special circumstances which warranted granting the relief he sought (see, Matter of Vega v. Bell, 47 N.Y.2d 543, 553, 419 N.Y.S.2d 454, 393 N.E.2d 450).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 11, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)