Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ann LEVINE, Respondent, v. AVON GREEN, INC., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Avon Green, Inc., and Darcey Associates appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated November 16, 2000, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries she allegedly sustained when she slipped and fell on snow on the defendants' property. In her complaint and bill of particulars the plaintiff alleged that her fall occurred on March 19, 1994, a day following a snowstorm, and that the defendants were negligent in failing to clear the accumulated snow from their property. The defendant Avon Green, Inc. (hereinafter Avon), the owner of the property, and the defendant Darcey Associates (hereinafter Darcey), the property manager, moved for summary judgment, contending that they were not negligent because the accident actually occurred on March 18, 1994, while the snowstorm was still in progress, and therefore, liability could not attach for any failure to clear the snow (see generally, Smith v. Leslie, 270 A.D.2d 333, 704 N.Y.S.2d 612; Wall v. Village of Mineola, 237 A.D.2d 511, 656 N.Y.S.2d 883). The Supreme Court properly denied their motion.
Although Avon and Darcey submitted evidence that called into question the accuracy of the plaintiff's recollection regarding the date of her accident, that evidence was insufficient to demonstrate, as a matter of law, that the accident occurred on March 18, 1994.
Accordingly, Avon and Darcey failed to establish, prima facie, their entitlement to summary judgment (see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572; Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642), and their motion was properly denied.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 03, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)