Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Floyd COWART, Appellant, v. Philip COOMBE Jr., as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered March 5, 1997 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to challenge respondent's policy of withholding “lag pay” until release.
Petitioner is an inmate serving a prison term which, in the aggregate, totals 80 1/212 years to life. Pursuant to prison directives, $18.80 of compensation earned by petitioner for work performed by him while incarcerated was withheld as “lag pay” which petitioner is entitled to receive upon release from the prison system (see, Allen v. Cuomo, 100 F.3d 253, 257-258). Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the lag pay policy, arguing that because it is unlikely that he will ever be released on parole, the withholding of his earned compensation is irrational. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and we affirm. The Commissioner of Correctional Services is vested with broad administrative and discretionary authority over inmates' access to wages during imprisonment and is free to hold such earnings in trust until an inmate's release (see, Correction Law §§ 187[3], 189[1]; Allen v. Cuomo, supra, at 257). This court will not interfere with the exercise of such authority absent a showing of a statutory violation or an abuse of discretion (see, People ex rel. Rheim v. Lyons, 276 A.D. 811, 812, 93 N.Y.S.2d 172, cert. denied 339 U.S. 925, 70 S.Ct. 616, 94 L.Ed. 1347). Finding that neither has been demonstrated here, we agree with Supreme Court that petitioner's argument with respect to the lag pay policy must fail. The judgment dismissing petitioner's application is therefore affirmed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 19, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)