Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joseph SZILASKI, et al., Appellants, v. APHRODITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated March 11, 1997, as granted the motion by the defendants Aphrodite Construction Company, Inc., Aphrodite Acquisitions, Inc., and Highfields Holdings Company, Inc., to vacate so much of an order of the same court dated April 15, 1996, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was for leave to enter judgment against the defendant Highfields Holdings Company, Inc., upon its default in answering the complaint.
ORDERED that the order dated March 11, 1997, is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the motion is denied, and so much of the order dated April 15, 1996, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was for leave to enter judgment against the defendant Highfields Holding Company, Inc., upon its default in answering the complaint is reinstated.
We reject the appellants' contention that the defendants Aphrodite Construction Company, Inc., Aphrodite Acquisitions, Inc., and Highfields Holding Company, Inc. (hereinafter the movants) should not have been allowed to relitigate the issue of the default on a motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) (see, Britvan v. Sutton & Edwards, Inc., 226 A.D.2d 491, 641 N.Y.S.2d 109; Picinic v. Seatrain Lines, Inc., 117 A.D.2d 504, 497 N.Y.S.2d 924). However, an application to vacate a default may be granted only if the movant establishes that its default was excusable and that it has a meritorious defense to the action (see, Grutman v. Southgate at Bar Harbor Home Owners' Assoc., Inc., 207 A.D.2d 526, 616 N.Y.S.2d 68). Here, since the movants failed to establish that the defendant Highfields Holdings Company, Inc., had a meritorious defense to the action (see, Ross v. Curtis-Palmer, 81 N.Y.2d 494, 500, 601 N.Y.S.2d 49, 618 N.E.2d 82), the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in vacating the default.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)