Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Raphael THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assault on an inmate, violent conduct, weapon possession and unauthorized organizational activity after an investigation revealed that he attempted to stab another inmate in a gang-related incident. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges and a penalty was imposed. The determination was thereafter affirmed on administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding by petitioner ensued.
Inasmuch as substantial evidence supports the determination of guilt, we confirm (see Matter of Hines v. Goord, 29 A.D.3d 1204, 1205, 814 N.Y.S.2d 807 [2006]; Matter of Shicon v. Goord, 27 A.D.3d 811, 811-812, 811 N.Y.S.2d 165 [2006] ). Despite petitioner's claims that he was not at the scene of the incident and that the alleged weapon was never found, the misbehavior report and testimony of the authoring correction officer provide a detailed account of petitioner's attempt to stab the inmate with “an ice pick like weapon.” In addition, the officer's testimony that the incident stemmed from the inmate's “problems with Bloods,” a gang with which petitioner was affiliated, as well as the inmate's corroborative testimony identifying petitioner as the perpetrator, further support the determination. Petitioner's exculpatory statements to the contrary simply presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Miller v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 295 A.D.2d 714, 714-715, 743 N.Y.S.2d 632 [2002] ). Finally, although the misbehavior report incorrectly states the date of the incident, both the officer and the inmate confirmed the correct date at the hearing (see Matter of Jenkins v. Goord, 30 A.D.3d 719, 720, 815 N.Y.S.2d 491 [2006] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 21, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)