Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Dwayne WHITE, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Following an investigation, petitioner was asked to submit a urine sample. After the urine sample twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance. Petitioner was found guilty following a disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This proceeding ensued.
The misbehavior report, accompanied by the positive test result and the testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Pollard v. Goord, 18 A.D.3d 1041, 1042, 794 N.Y.S.2d 739 [2005]; Matter of Zippo v. Goord, 2 A.D.3d 1006, 1006, 768 N.Y.S.2d 406 [2003] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the request for urinalysis test form and testimony from the correction officer who collected, tested and destroyed the sample establish a secure chain of custody and that proper testing procedures were followed (see 7 NYCRR 1020.4[e]; Matter of Burgos-Morales v. Goord, 22 A.D.3d 999, 1000, 802 N.Y.S.2d 388 [2005]; Matter of Ranson v. Selsky, 22 A.D.3d 935, 935-936, 802 N.Y.S.2d 277 [2005] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including that he was denied relevant documentary evidence and that the hearing transcript was inadequate for meaningful review, are either unpreserved or have been determined to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 21, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)