Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NATHANIEL “JJ”,1 a Person in Need of Supervision. Dutchess County Probation Department, Respondent; Nathanial “JJ”, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), entered January 20, 1999, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, to revoke a prior order of probation and placed respondent in the custody of the Columbia County Commissioner of Social Services 2 for a period of 18 months.
In October 1997, respondent was adjudicated a person in need of supervision and placed on probation for a period of 12 months, retroactive to July 1997. This proceeding was commenced in May 1998 alleging that respondent violated the conditions of his probation by, inter alia, repeated tardiness and illegal absences from school and threatening a teacher. After a fact-finding hearing in October 1998, Family Court found that respondent had violated his probation. Following a dispositional hearing in November 1998, respondent was placed in the custody of the Columbia County Commissioner of Social Services for a period of 18 months. This appeal ensued.
As a threshold matter, we agree with respondent that the January 20, 1999 order of disposition fails to satisfy the mandates of Family Court Act § 754(2)(a) in that it neither specifies the reasons for the disposition nor contains the specific findings required when a child is placed in accordance with Family Court Act § 756. Determination of the appeal is therefore withheld and the matter remitted to Family Court for the purpose of amending its order to comply with the statutory mandate (see, Matter of Eric O., 199 A.D.2d 780, 605 N.Y.S.2d 502; Matter of Robert U., 189 A.D.2d 1014, 592 N.Y.S.2d 867; Matter of Ricky B., 55 A.D.2d 800, 390 N.Y.S.2d 268).
ORDERED that the decision is withheld, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Columbia County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court's decision.
FOOTNOTES
2. It is noted that while respondent was adjudicated a person in need of supervision and placed on probation in Columbia County, where his father resides, his probation was transferred to Dutchess County when he moved there to live with his mother. Columbia County, however, retained all other jurisdiction over this case.
MIKOLL, J.P.
CREW III, YESAWICH JR., PETERS and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)