Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: William F. BONEZ, Petitioner, v. Daniel SENKOWSKI, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
The misbehavior report and the corroborating testimony of the physician's assistant describing petitioner's disruptive behavior when he was denied medical showers provides substantial evidence to support the determination which found him guilty of attempted assault on staff and interference with an employee in violation of certain prison disciplinary rules (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). While the Hearing Officer failed to supply petitioner with a written explanation for the denial of his request for a character witness (see, 7 NYCRR 254.5[a] ), we nonetheless find no reason to set aside the determination inasmuch as the record clearly discloses the reason for the denial, i.e., that the witness had no first-hand knowledge of the incident (see, Matter of Morrison v. Selsky, 246 A.D.2d 939, 667 N.Y.S.2d 856; see also, Matter of Danaher v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 754, 661 N.Y.S.2d 858). To the extent that petitioner asserts that the misbehavior report was fabricated and written in retaliation for the grievance he filed against the physician's assistant, this merely presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Lawrence v. Headley, 257 A.D.2d 837, 685 N.Y.S.2d 118). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 21, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)