Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ana LOPEZ, respondent, v. K ANGLE K, INC., d/b/a K & K Super Buffet, et al., appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated April 6, 2005, which denied their motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Queens County.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, all papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (see CPLR 511 [d] ).
The plaintiff, a resident of Queens County, filed a summons and complaint in the Supreme Court, Kings County, to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a slip and fall on the public sidewalk located in front of the defendants' premises in Queens County. The summons stated that the basis for the designated venue of Kings County was the “[d]efendant's residence.” The defendants first demanded and then moved for a change of venue to Queens County alleging that they did not reside in Kings County and that their principal place of business, 341-345 St. Nicholas Avenue, Ridgewood, was in Queens County (see CPLR 511[b]; Kaplan v. Waldbaum's Inc., 208 A.D.2d 683, 617 N.Y.S.2d 503; Shavaknbeyn v. Starrett City, 161 A.D.2d 626, 555 N.Y.S.2d 405; Weinstein Enters. v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 112 A.D.2d 219, 491 N.Y.S.2d 436). The defendants satisfied their burden of establishing that their residence was in Queens County, and in the absence of any documentary evidence establishing that the defendants' residence was in Kings County, the defendants were entitled to a change of venue as of right (see CPLR 510[1]; Delia v. Winter, 183 A.D.2d 1006, 583 N.Y.S.2d 591). Accordingly, the defendants' motion should have been granted.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 05, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)