Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph WIGFALL, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of refusing a direct order, making threats, harassing facility staff and creating a disturbance. Upon administrative appeal, that determination was affirmed with a modified penalty of 90 days in the special housing unit and a corresponding loss of privileges, along with 60 days of recommended loss of good time. This CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. Substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and testimony adduced at the hearing support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Rodriguez v. Selsky, 50 A.D.3d 1337, 1337, 854 N.Y.S.2d 823 [2008] ). Any conflicts that could be construed in the hearing testimony presented credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Chaney v. Selsky, 37 A.D.3d 983, 984, 830 N.Y.S.2d 605 [2007] ), as did petitioner's assertion that the misbehavior report was fabricated in an effort to harass him (see Matter of Williams v. Selsky, 50 A.D.3d 1426, 1427, 856 N.Y.S.2d 698 [2008] ). The lapses in the hearing transcript were “not so significant as to preclude meaningful review by this Court” (Matter of Butler v. Selsky, 49 A.D.3d 1122, 1123, 853 N.Y.S.2d 709 [2008] ). As for petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied documentary evidence, we have examined them and find no reason to disturb the determination.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)