Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Miguel HARVEY, Petitioner, v. R.K. WOODS, as Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in two misbehavior reports with refusing a search, disobeying a direct order (two counts), violating movement regulations and committing an unhygienic act. The first report arose out of petitioner's refusal to lift his feet to be scanned by a metal detector. The second report stemmed from petitioner's refusal to return his restraints, which he had adjusted, to the proper position, as well as his spitting on the wall and floor. Following a combined tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. Upon administrative appeal, that determination was affirmed with a modified penalty and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior reports, videotapes depicting petitioner's conduct and testimony adduced at the hearing (see Matter of Porter v. Goord, 47 A.D.3d 978, 979, 849 N.Y.S.2d 326 [2008] ). Petitioner's claim of inconsistencies in the evidence, along with the exculpatory testimony offered by petitioner and his inmate witness, created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Jones v. Goord, 50 A.D.3d 1427, 1427, 856 N.Y.S.2d 700 [2008] ). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that the hearing was untimely, the Hearing Officer was biased and he was denied two inmate witnesses, and find no reason to disturb the determination.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)