Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rudolph GRIFFIN, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.), rendered November 27, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.
Defendant was a passenger in a vehicle that was stopped for an equipment violation by State Troopers James Soro and Terry Bauer. After discovering that the driver's operator's license was suspended and that none of three other occupants had a valid operator's license, the Troopers impounded the vehicle and commenced an inventory search. While Soro was conducting the inventory, he discovered a brown paper bag under the front passenger seat. When he looked inside the bag, he observed four plastic baggies containing a white powdery substance. He showed the bag to Bauer who recognized the white substance as cocaine. The Troopers then arrested defendant and the other occupants of the vehicle. Following the denial of his suppression motion, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and thereafter was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of four years to life. He now appeals.
We affirm. It is now settled that an inventory search of an automobile is constitutionally valid where, as here, it is conducted in accordance with the procedures contained in the State Police Field Manual (see, People v. Turriago, 90 N.Y.2d 77, 87, 659 N.Y.S.2d 183, 681 N.E.2d 350; People v. Washington, 233 A.D.2d 684, 686, 650 N.Y.S.2d 334, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1042, 659 N.Y.S.2d 873, 681 N.E.2d 1320). We further conclude that defendant's arrest was supported by probable cause in light of Bauer's recognition that the white substance was cocaine (see, People v. Nedo, 193 A.D.2d 1022, 598 N.Y.S.2d 387). Lastly, by pleading guilty, defendant waived his claim that the evidence before the Grand Jury was not legally sufficient (see, People v. Austro, 239 A.D.2d 833, 658 N.Y.S.2d 456, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 890, 662 N.Y.S.2d 433, 685 N.E.2d 214; People v. Torres, 238 A.D.2d 827, 656 N.Y.S.2d 533, lvs. denied 90 N.Y.2d 865, 661 N.Y.S.2d 192, 683 N.E.2d 1066).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
WHITE, Justice.
MIKOLL, J.P., and CREW, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 04, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)