Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Albert KELLY, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a physical altercation with another inmate, petitioner was charged by two separate misbehavior reports with violating various prison disciplinary rules. After a tier III disciplinary hearing, at which he pleaded guilty to the charges contained in the second misbehavior report, petitioner was found guilty of fighting and engaging in violent conduct. We reject petitioner's contention that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence. Included in the evidence presented at the disciplinary hearing was the first misbehavior report stating that, as several inmates were yelling “fight” and pointing to the restroom, an injured and bloody inmate emerged from the restroom with petitioner in pursuit. The inmate then grabbed a push broom and headed toward petitioner, who was in an aggressive stance with his fists clenched. The detailed misbehavior report, together with the corroborating testimony of the correction officer who witnessed the incident and petitioner's testimony that he attempted to join the fight, provided substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Washington v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 914, 666 N.Y.S.2d 796; Matter of Wilkinson v. Coombe, 242 A.D.2d 834, 662 N.Y.S.2d 409). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 11, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)