Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jose VILLATORO, respondent, v. GRAND BOULEVARD REALTY, INC., defendant, Popei's Claim Bar Ltd. of Deer Park, appellant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Popei's Clam Bar Ltd. of Deer Park appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), dated September 21, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.
Contrary to the holding of the Supreme Court, “[w]orkers' compensation is an exclusive remedy as a matter of substantive law, and where it appears that the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant, the obligation of alleging and proving noncoverage falls upon the plaintiff” (Rainey v. Jefferson Vil. Condo No. 11 Assocs., 203 A.D.2d 544, 546, 611 N.Y.S.2d 207; see Murray v. City of New York, 43 N.Y.2d 400, 407, 401 N.Y.S.2d 773, 372 N.E.2d 560; O'Rourke v. Long, 41 N.Y.2d 219, 226, 391 N.Y.S.2d 553, 359 N.E.2d 1347; Heifetz v. Metropolitan Jewish Geriatric Ctr., 135 A.D.2d 498, 500, 521 N.Y.S.2d 739; Gyory v. Radgowski, 89 A.D.2d 867, 869, 453 N.Y.S.2d 243). The appellant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law through deposition testimony that the plaintiff was an employee covered by workers' compensation insurance. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 16, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)