Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Neil DeSENA, etc., respondent, v. HIP HOSPITAL, INC., et al., appellants, et al., defendant.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants HIP Hospital, Inc., La Guardia Hospital, Queens-Long Island Medical Group, P.C., La Guardia Medical Group, Dinesh Chandra Sinha, M.D., and Joseph Biase, M.D., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated February 19, 1998, which denied the motion of the defendant Joseph Biase, M.D., to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) due to allegedly improper service of process and which granted the plaintiff's cross motion to compel him to comply with certain discovery demands.
ORDERED that the appeal by the defendants HIP Hospital, Inc., La Guardia Hospital, Queens-Long Island Medical Group, P.C., La Guardia Medical Group, and Dinesh Chandra Sinha, M.D., is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as these defendants are not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see, CPLR 5511; Sidor v. Zuhoski, 257 A.D.2d 564, 683 N.Y.S.2d 590); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed by the defendant Joseph Biase, M.D., without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the contentions of Dr. Joseph Biase, the Supreme Court correctly denied his motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) due to allegedly improper service of process. Dr. Biase's failure to move for dismissal within the time parameters of CPLR 3211(e), as amended (L.1996, ch. 501), resulted in the waiver of his service objections (see, Wade v. Byung Yang Kim, 250 A.D.2d 323, 681 N.Y.S.2d 355; LaSorsa v. Corrigan, 256 A.D.2d 313, 681 N.Y.S.2d 300; Fleet Bank v. Riese, 247 A.D.2d 276, 668 N.Y.S.2d 611).
Dr. Biase's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 16, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)