Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robert CAPONE a/k/a Robert S. Capone, deceased. Michael L. Capone, respondent; Edward L. Ford, appellant.
In a proceeding to compel Edward L. Ford, as executor of the estate of Robert Capone, a/k/a Robert S. Capone to render an accounting, the executor appeals from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Rockland County (Weiner, S.), dated March 13, 1998, which granted the petition and directed him to file a formal judicial accounting with the court.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In October 1996 after having received two interim accountings of the estate from the estate's attorney, the petitioner executed a release in favor of the executor in return for a partial distribution of his inheritance. Over a year later, the petitioner sought to compel a formal judicial accounting and asserted that the release was invalid. The Surrogate granted the petition.
A release executed in the absence of bad faith, fraud, or duress, and with full knowledge of the estate's status, will generally be upheld as valid (see, Matter of Fechter, 25 Misc.2d 229, 205 N.Y.S.2d 384; Matter of Amuso, 18 Misc.2d 936, 187 N.Y.S.2d 519; Matter of Salomon's Will, 175 Misc. 264, 23 N.Y.S.2d 72). In the instant case, although the petitioner received two separate interim accountings before signing the release, they were only brief summaries, failed to provide a complete picture of the estate, and significantly understated the estate's tax liability. Since the record fails to show that the petitioner executed the release with full knowledge of the estate's status, the Surrogate properly invalidated the release and directed the executor to file a formal judicial accounting (see, Matter of Fechter, supra).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 16, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)