Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Andre WAUL, petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services of the State of New York, et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services of the State of New York, dated December 24, 1996, which affirmed the decision of a Hearing Officer, made after an administrative hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of obstructing visibility in his State correctional facility cell and imposing a penalty.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The record contains substantial evidence to support the determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services of the State of New York that the petitioner, an inmate at the Auburn State correctional facility, violated an institutional rule (see, CPLR 7803[4]; Matter of Boyd v. Constantine, 81 N.Y.2d 189, 196, 597 N.Y.S.2d 605, 613 N.E.2d 511; Matter of Koh v. Perales, 173 A.D.2d 477, 478, 570 N.Y.S.2d 98). Additionally, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 230, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, Horton v. Smith, 51 N.Y.2d 798, 433 N.Y.S.2d 92, 412 N.E.2d 1318; Matter of Anthony Baker v. Chief of the New York City Tr. Police Dept., 232 A.D.2d 632, 648 N.Y.S.2d 1001), and, in any event, do not provide a basis for granting the petition.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 16, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)