Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rose C. MARINO, appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., defendants, American Airlines, Inc., respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated January 5, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment in favor of American Airlines, Inc., and denied that branch of her cross motion which was for a continuance to permit the defendant American Airlines, Inc., to fully comply with her discovery demands.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
“It is well settled that one who hires an independent contractor is not liable for the independent contractor's negligent acts because the employer has no right to control the manner in which the work is to be done” (Mercado v. Slope Assocs., 246 A.D.2d 581, 667 N.Y.S.2d 289; see, Dente v. Staten Island Univ. Hosp., 252 A.D.2d 536, 675 N.Y.S.2d 621). Here, American Airlines, Inc., submitted sufficient evidence to establish, as a matter of law, that Combined Contract Services, Inc., which provided the personnel for curbside check in, was an independent contractor, and the plaintiff failed to raise a triable question of fact on this issue.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, CPLR 3212(f) does not countenance the postponement of summary disposition where, as here, in opposing the motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff merely speculates that discovery might uncover that the injuries sued upon resulted from the defendants' negligence (see, Agoglia v. Sterling Foster & Co., 237 A.D.2d 549, 655 N.Y.S.2d 636).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)