Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. David SAFRAN, Appellant, v. Gary H. FILION, as Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Respondent. (And Three Other Related Proceedings.)
Appeals from three judgments of the Supreme Court (Lalor, J.), entered August 17, 2004, November 8, 2004 and November 12, 2004 in Greene County, which dismissed petitioner's applications, in four proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Petitioner was charged with two counts of assault in the first degree and one count of reckless endangerment in the first degree. After criminal proceedings had commenced, he pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. In August 2002, he was sentenced to three years in prison, to be followed by an 18-month period of postrelease supervision. Thereafter, petitioner made a number of unsuccessful motions pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate the judgment of conviction. In addition, he commenced four proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 70 seeking habeas corpus relief. Each of these proceedings was dismissed by Supreme Court without a hearing. Petitioner appeals such dismissals, which have been consolidated.
We note that all of the assertions raised in petitioner's applications involve matters that could have been raised on direct appeal or in the context of a CPL article 440 motion. Consequently, they are not the proper subject of a habeas corpus proceeding (see People ex rel. Hunter v. Buffardi, 15 A.D.3d 736, 788 N.Y.S.2d 871 [2005]; People ex rel. Sacco v. Greene, 13 A.D.3d 1015, 786 N.Y.S.2d 369 [2004], lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 811, 796 N.Y.S.2d 32, 828 N.E.2d 990 [2005] ). In any event, even if we were to consider them and conclude that they had merit, petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release from prison (see People ex rel. Burr v. Smith, 6 A.D.3d 841, 841, 773 N.Y.S.2d 913 [2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 605, 785 N.Y.S.2d 21, 818 N.E.2d 663 [2004] ). Accordingly, dismissal of the applications was appropriate.
ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 20, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)