Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Stacy CALHOUN, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner left the correctional facility where he was incarcerated, having received a pass for an overnight visit to his home. When he returned, he was charged in a misbehavior report with absconding, exceeding time limits and violating temporary release rules. At a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner testified that a counselor gave him permission to leave the facility overnight in return for a payment of $120. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Officer found petitioner guilty of absconding and violating temporary release rules. On administrative appeal, the charge of absconding was dismissed and petitioner was found guilty only of violating temporary release rules. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The record includes a memorandum from the correction officer in charge of keeping track of the inmates indicating that inmates are advised during orientation of the rules governing pass procedures, and that they are eligible only after 30 days of incarceration. Petitioner was not eligible for a pass because he had not been at the facility for 30 days. This, together with the misbehavior report and petitioner's admission that he paid a counselor for the overnight pass, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Gonzalez v. Goord, 289 A.D.2d 736, 733 N.Y.S.2d 652 [2001] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 26, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)