Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MESSIAH QUWAN D. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services of New York, etc., Petitioner-Respondent; William D. (Anonymous), Appellant, et al., Respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a fact-finding and dispositional order (one paper) of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), dated November 19, 1999, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, inter alia, terminated his parental rights to the subject child on the grounds of abandonment and permanent neglect, and transferred custody and guardianship rights to the petitioner Heart Share Human Services of New York for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly determined that there was clear and convincing evidence of the appellant father's abandonment of his child based on his failure to visit the child or communicate with the petitioner agency during the six-month period before the filing of the petition (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[4][b], [5][a] ). The father did not establish that he was unable to contact either the child or the agency, or that he was discouraged from making contact by the agency (see, Matter of Catholic Child Care Socy. of Diocese of Brooklyn, 112 A.D.2d 1039, 1040, 492 N.Y.S.2d 831; Matter of Anthony M., 195 A.D.2d 315, 600 N.Y.S.2d 37). In light of this holding, we need not address the issue of permanent neglect.
Furthermore, the Family Court properly determined that the child's best interests would be served by terminating the father's parental rights and freeing the child for adoption (see, Family Ct. Act §§ 623, 631; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824; Matter of Crystal C., 219 A.D.2d 601, 631 N.Y.S.2d 376; Matter of Desire Star H., 202 A.D.2d 582, 609 N.Y.S.2d 268).
O'BRIEN, J.P., ALTMAN, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 19, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)