PEOPLE v. UMADAT (2006)

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), rendered August 4, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), criminal sale of marijuana in the fourth degree, and unlawful possession of marijuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.   The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Cooperman, J.), of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

 The factual findings and credibility determinations of a hearing court are accorded great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v. Cameron, 6 A.D.3d 546, 775 N.Y.S.2d 63).   Here, nothing in the record supports the defendant's contention that the testimony of the arresting detective at the hearing was incredible or patently tailored to nullify constitutional objections (see People v. James, 19 A.D.3d 617, 618, 798 N.Y.S.2d 483;  People v. Natiello, 294 A.D.2d 451, 741 N.Y.S.2d 742;  People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88, 353 N.Y.S.2d 500).   Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement officials.