Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
NPR, LLC, respondent, v. K.A.B.B., INC., appellant.
In an action, inter alia, to recover unpaid rent, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), entered September 9, 2004, which, upon an order of the same court dated June 18, 2004, granting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sums of $126,095.10 for unpaid rent, $1,241.24 for damage to property, and $32,175 for an attorney's fee.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
In June 2001 the plaintiff-landlord completed efforts to remedy an environmental hazard (toxic mold) that existed in premises leased to the defendant-tenant. By letter dated October 16, 2001, the defendant-tenant complained that the efforts had been insufficient to eliminate the environmental hazard. Consequently, the defendant asserted that it would terminate its lease as soon as it secured new space. The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover unpaid rent after the defendant vacated the premises prior to the expiration of the lease. The defendant appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the grant of summary judgment. We affirm.
The plaintiff demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by offering evidence that the toxic mold condition had been timely abated and that the demised premises did not pose an environmental hazard. In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact that it was constructively evicted from the premises or otherwise permissibly terminated the lease (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 24, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)