Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: David DONHAUSER, Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McDonough, J.), entered March 14, 2007 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding that petitioner's sentence included a period of postrelease supervision.
As a second violent felony offender, petitioner was sentenced, among various terms, to a prison sentence of 12 years for burglary in the second degree. The sentencing court did not impose any period of postrelease supervision. After petitioner entered the prison system, the Department of Correctional Services calculated his time by including a five-year period of postrelease supervision. Contending that his sentence does not explicitly include a period of postrelease supervision, petitioner commenced this proceeding to review the determination of respondent which found that petitioner's sentence included a period of postrelease supervision. Relying upon our previous case law that postrelease supervision was automatically included as a part of petitioner's sentence pursuant to Penal Law § 70.45, Supreme Court dismissed the petition.
Subsequent to Supreme Court's dismissal, this Court held that postrelease supervision sentencing is exclusively the province of the courts (see Matter of Dreher v. Goord, 46 A.D.3d 1261, 1262, 848 N.Y.S.2d 758 [2007] ). Since the only legally cognizable sentence is one imposed by a judge, “[a]ny alteration to that sentence, unless made by a judge in a subsequent proceeding, is of no effect” (Earley v. Murray, 451 F.3d 71, 75 [2d Cir.2006], cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 127 S.Ct. 3014, 168 L.Ed.2d 752 [2007]; see Matter of Quinones v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 46 A.D.3d 1268, 848 N.Y.S.2d 757 [2007] ). Accordingly, we must reverse.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, petition granted and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
CARPINELLO, J.
CARDONA, P.J., SPAIN, KAVANAGH and STEIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 28, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)