IN RE: AMANDA C. (Anonymous). (2003)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: AMANDA C. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kelly M. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Brian W. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kelly M. (Anonymous), Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2).

Decided: October 06, 2003

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.

Anna Martin, East Moriches, NY, for appellant. Robert J. Cimino, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Randall J. Ratje of counsel), for respondent. Paraskevi Zarkadas, Centereach, NY, Law Guardian for the children.

In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McElligott, J.), entered November 5, 2001, as, after a hearing, granted the petition of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services to change the permanency goals of the subject children, so as to free them for adoption.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner met its burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that a plan to change the permanency goals of the children so as to free them for adoption is in the children's best interests in light of the their medical needs, the fact that the they are in pre-adoptive homes, and the mother's failure to take rehabilitative steps. Accordingly, the Family Court's determination is supported by the record.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network