Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SOOK JA LEE, et al., Appellants, v. YI MEI BAKERY CORP., etc., Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated February 15, 2002, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages, inter alia, for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff Sook Ja Lee when she slipped and fell due to an alleged accumulation of water on the floor of the defendant's bakery. The Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We affirm.
The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence that it took reasonable precautions to remedy the wet condition on its premises caused by a lengthy rainstorm (see Miller v. Gimbel Bros., Inc., 262 N.Y. 107, 186 N.E. 410). In this regard, the defendant averred that a rubberized mat was placed on the street side of the front door and another one about one foot inside the front door, and the defendant's employees were instructed to mop the floor, as necessary, which they did approximately four times during the morning of the accident prior to the injured plaintiff's fall (see Negron v. St. Patrick's Nursing Home, 248 A.D.2d 687, 671 N.Y.S.2d 275; Kovelsky v. City Univ. of N.Y., 221 A.D.2d 234, 235, 634 N.Y.S.2d 1).
In opposition, the plaintiffs did not raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572; Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642; Assing v. United Rubber Supply Co., 126 A.D.2d 590, 511 N.Y.S.2d 31).
The plaintiffs' remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 19, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)