Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Nelson RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered April 4, 2007 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance.
Petitioner, an inmate, filed a grievance challenging a recommendation that he participate in an Alcohol and Substance Abuse Treatment program, arguing that his more than 10-year abstinence from drug or alcohol use exempted him. His grievance was initially granted by the Inmate Grievance Resolution Committee, but was then denied by respondent Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioner appeals.
It is the policy of the Department of Correctional Services to recommend Alcohol and Substance Abuse Treatment programming for all inmates with a history of alcohol or drug abuse. Although previous policy informally exempted inmates who demonstrated a period of abstinence of 10 years or more, the current policy provides no such relief because of evidence that individuals with a history of drug or alcohol abuse can readily relapse even after many years of abstinence. Inasmuch as petitioner admittedly has a history of alcohol and drug abuse, the denial of his grievance was not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Gomez v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 963, 964-965, 823 N.Y.S.2d 610 [2006]; Matter of McKethan v. Kafka, 31 A.D.3d 1078, 1079, 819 N.Y.S.2d 204 [2006] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 17, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)