Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Stoney HARRISON, Petitioner, v. M. BERTONE, as Correction Sergeant, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
After another inmate was found to be in possession of audio cassettes that were intended for petitioner along with a letter directing petitioner on how to proceed with the sale of the cassettes, a search of petitioner's prison cell recovered numerous prohibited items, including audio cassettes and handwritten notes with information pertaining to the sale of cassettes. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of solicitation and possession of contraband. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
Petitioner asserts that the portion of the determination which found him guilty of solicitation must be annulled. We disagree, noting that the misbehavior report, together with the hearing testimony from the authoring correction officer, provide substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of McCloud v. Selsky, 45 A.D.3d 1127, 1128, 844 N.Y.S.2d 917 [2007]; Matter of Chavis v. Goord, 45 A.D.3d 1063, 1064, 845 N.Y.S.2d 866 [2007] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that the hearing was untimely and the Hearing Officer acted unfairly, have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 17, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)