Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CAROLYN F. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, respondent; Calvin F. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Jeanette F. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, respondent; Calvin F. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2). In the Matter of Tamika F. (Anonymous). Orange County Department of Social Services, respondent; Calvin F. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 3).
In related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), dated August 3, 2007, which, after a fact-finding and dispositional hearing, determined that he failed to comply with the terms and conditions of a “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Order of Disposition, Suspended Judgment” of the same court dated March 7, 2007, terminated his parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject children to the petitioner, Orange County Department of Social Services, for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner, Orange County Department of Social Services, showed, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the father had violated the terms and conditions of a “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law & Order of Disposition, Suspended Judgment” dated March 7, 2007 (see Matter of Michael Phillip T., 44 A.D.3d 1062, 1063, 845 N.Y.S.2d 790). Contrary to the father's contention, the petitioner was not required to prove that it made diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship, because the father admitted, inter alia, that he permanently neglected the subject children and that caseworkers had exercised due diligence in working with him (see Matter of Aaron S., 15 A.D.3d 585, 586, 790 N.Y.S.2d 208; Matter of Fard Saleem G., 297 A.D.2d 677, 747 N.Y.S.2d 107; Matter of Patricia O., 175 A.D.2d 870, 573 N.Y.S.2d 716). Furthermore, the Family Court properly admitted records concerning the father's substance abuse treatment (see CPLR 4518; Matter of Alyshia M.R., 53 A.D.3d 1060, 861 N.Y.S.2d 551).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 21, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)